The strongest arguments against AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) concern whether it can measure scientific value reliably, resist manipulation, and turn fair recognition into additional research. These objections challenge the connection between […]

International scientific collaboration is valuable when partners contribute complementary knowledge, facilities, data, or perspectives. But making foreign partners a condition of funding can create a perverse incentive: researchers must assemble […]

Your fucking scientists more want not to find truth, they want to make formulas more complex. (I have a special taste of formulas, my ordered semicategories actions theory uses complex […]

Many Christians reject technology as a “devils’s invention” and associate it with coming Antichrist. No doubt, the Antichrist will use advanced technology, but doesn’t everyone else do, too? The solution […]

AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) can influence UNESCO only if it is presented as a testable implementation mechanism for open science, not as a finished system that UNESCO should immediately endorse or […]

The realistic objective should not initially be “UNESCO adopts AIIM as its policy.” That framing is too large, premature, and institutionally ambiguous. A credible progression is: UNESCO recognizes an independently […]

The AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) can help governments implement UNESCO open science principles by connecting public funding to documented open contributions. Instead of merely asking researchers to publish openly, AIIM can […]

In November 2021, UNESCO’s General Conference unanimously adopted the Recommendation on Open Science, establishing the first global framework for making scientific knowledge more accessible, reusable, transparent and equitable. The Recommendation […]

Recognizing and funding a scientist may appear to benefit one individual. In reality, the consequences can spread throughout society. A supported scientist gains time, resources, and visibility to prove a […]