Formal verification could fundamentally change mathematical publishing by separating two questions that journals currently handle together: “Is this proof logically valid?” and “Is this mathematics important, original, and understandable?” A […]
Why Monographs Receive Less Recognition Than Papers
Monographs often receive less academic recognition than journal papers not because they necessarily contribute less knowledge, but because modern research evaluation is optimized for short, standardized, rapidly measurable outputs. Papers […]
On-Chain Scientific Reputation and the Right to Appeal
On-chain scientific reputation can make research evaluation more transparent, portable, and resistant to institutional manipulation. However, an immutable reputation system becomes dangerous when it treats past judgments as permanently correct. […]
Should Research Data Ever Be Stored On-Chain
Research data should rarely be stored directly on a blockchain. In most scientific systems, the better architecture is to store datasets in suitable off-chain repositories while recording their cryptographic hashes, […]
AI-Assisted Scientific Hiring: Better Evaluation or Automated Prestige Bias
AI-assisted scientific hiring can improve recruitment by reading more research, applying explicit criteria consistently, and identifying contributions that busy committees might overlook. But it can also reproduce—and scale—the academic prestige […]
AI as a Scientific Auditor: What Can Actually Be Verified
Artificial intelligence can already perform useful scientific audits, but the word verify must be used carefully. An AI system can check whether a paper’s citations exist, reproduce calculations, execute available […]
Can AI Detect Scientific Fraud Better Than Humans
Artificial intelligence can detect some forms of scientific fraud faster and more consistently than humans, especially when screening large numbers of papers for duplicated images, copied text, statistical anomalies, and […]
Funding Teams vs Funding Individuals: Which Model Produces Better Science
Research funding is often presented as a choice between supporting individual investigators and financing research teams. Both models are necessary, but they solve different problems. Individual funding protects intellectual independence, […]
The Economics of Scientific Reputation: How Prestige Becomes Funding, Influence, and Inequality
Scientific reputation is not merely admiration. It is an economically valuable asset that affects who receives research funding, who attracts talented collaborators, whose papers are read, and whose claims are […]
Should Donors Fund Research, Evaluation, or Scientific Infrastructure
Donors should rarely choose exclusively between research, evaluation, and scientific infrastructure. A healthy scientific funding portfolio needs all three: research produces new knowledge, evaluation identifies and improves valuable work, and […]