This page lists key contributors to the science-funding project, including work related to the SciWard project. Public profiles, publications, software repositories, and source documents are linked so readers can verify the information presented here.
Victor Porton
Victor Lvovich Porton, CEO of the science-funding project, is a mathematician and software developer. Public profiles: ORCID 0000-0001-7064-7975, Google Scholar, GitHub, and LinkedIn. His research and software work includes ordered semigroup actions and ordered semicategory actions, funcoids, discontinuous analysis, reloids, the Automatic Transformation of XML Namespaces specification, and XML Boiler.
Selected scientific and software-development work:
- Algebraic Theory of General Topology. Book 1 — a research monograph; an earlier version was published by INFRA-M.
- Discontinuous Analysis — work on generalized limits, with a publication record linked for verification.
- Axiomatic Theory of Formulas (draft) — a theory of finite and infinite expressions.
- Automatic Transformation of XML Namespaces — a formal specification for describing XML semantics using RDF resources and processing XML documents that contain multiple namespaces.
- XML Boiler — software implementing the specification.
Additional research profiles are available on ResearchGate and Academia.edu.
An academic evaluation document from Perm State University is embedded below as a primary source.
Verification and editorial transparency
This page is authored by Victor Porton and has received AI-assisted editorial and SEO editing. Where available, claims are linked to public profiles, publications, repositories, or primary documents. Readers should evaluate research claims against the cited sources; inclusion on this page does not constitute independent peer review or endorsement.
Help Turn SciWard’s Beta into Evidence
SciWard remains experimental. The next proposed milestone is a five-month public adversarial test, with $1,000 planned for distribution to eligible funding recipients. Donations support the work required to run and evaluate that test.
Fund the public test → Test proposal → Independent review →
AI-generated evaluations can contain factual errors or biases. Public testing, auditability, and external criticism remain part of the project.
5 thoughts on “Key Contributors to the science-funding project”