A prospective remediation plan for SciWard’s adversarial testing: paid independent reviews, seven-day challenges, stronger controls and retesting.
Rebrainding: AIIM Renamed to SciWard
The first choice of the project name, AI Internet-Meritocracy was bad, because its abbreviation AIIM is already used by several other projects. So, by Victor Porton’s decision it was renamed […]
Professional Ethics as a Substitute for Morality in Academia: Why Researchers Need Freedom to Act Morally
Academia has extensive systems of professional ethics. Researchers are told not to fabricate data, not to plagiarize, to disclose conflicts of interest, to respect research participants, and to follow established […]
When Scientific Talent Is Wasted: Underemployment, Skills Mismatch, and How SciWard Could Help
When a person with substantial scientific or technical expertise has to spend most of their working life doing a job that does not use that expertise, we usually call it […]
Research Institutions as a Kolkhoz: Could SciWard Make Science More Efficient
Hypothesis: SciWard could produce more valuable research per dollar than institution-centered funding by reducing bureaucracy, strengthening individual recognition, and giving researchers greater control over their work. Its potential advantages concern […]
When International Scientific Collaboration Becomes a Funding Barrier
International scientific collaboration is valuable when partners contribute complementary knowledge, facilities, data, or perspectives. But making foreign partners a condition of funding can create a perverse incentive: researchers must assemble […]
Letter to Trump: Symbiote AGI Safety Fund in 2026
Your fucking scientists more want not to find truth, they want to make formulas more complex. (I have a special taste of formulas, my ordered semicategories actions theory uses complex […]
Why Christians Should Stand for Technology
Many Christians reject technology as a “devils’s invention” and associate it with coming Antichrist. No doubt, the Antichrist will use advanced technology, but doesn’t everyone else do, too? The solution […]
How SciWard Can Influence UNESCO Open Science Policy
SciWard can influence UNESCO only if it is presented as a testable implementation mechanism for open science, not as a finished system that UNESCO should immediately endorse or impose on […]
How we can influence UNESCO for them to accept SciWard as their tool and using SciWard as their policy
The realistic objective should not initially be “UNESCO adopts SciWard as its policy.” That framing is too large, premature, and institutionally ambiguous. A credible progression is: UNESCO recognizes an independently […]