Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Donating directly to scientific research allows you to bypass large administrative layers and channel capital to actual investigators, labs, and open infrastructure. If executed correctly, this approach increases capital efficiency, transparency, and measurable impact 📊.

Below is a structured guide outlining the primary mechanisms.

---

Donate Directly to a University Laboratory

Mechanism

Most universities allow restricted gifts to a specific:

• Principal Investigator (PI)
• Research lab
• Department
• Named research fund

How to Execute

1. Identify a researcher whose work aligns with your goals.
2. Contact their university development office.
3. Specify that your donation is restricted to that lab/project.
4. Request reporting commitments.

Advantages

• Tax-deductible (in most jurisdictions)
• Institutional oversight
• Suitable for larger donations

Risks

• Administrative overhead (10–50%)
• Limited control over use of funds

---

Fund an Independent Researcher Directly

Some researchers operate outside universities.

Channels

• Personal websites
• GitHub Sponsors (for open science/software)
• Patreon / Buy Me a Coffee
• Direct bank transfer or crypto wallet

Best Practice

Use a simple funding agreement defining:

• Scope
• Reporting schedule
• Deliverables (if any)

This model resembles venture capital for science — high risk, high upside ⚙️.

---

Support Open Science Infrastructure

Instead of funding one lab, you can support infrastructure such as:

• Open-access journals
• Preprint servers
• Research data repositories
• Open-source scientific software

This improves systemic research efficiency.

---

Use Decentralized Science (DeSci) Platforms

Decentralized Science (DeSci) leverages blockchain for:

• Transparent funding allocation
• On-chain governance
• Milestone-based payouts

Typical model:

• Researchers submit proposals
• Token holders vote
• Smart contracts release funds

This increases transparency and reduces institutional friction 🔗.

---

Create a Micro-Grant

If you want maximum control:

1. Define a problem statement.
2. Publish a call for proposals.
3. Select a recipient.
4. Disburse funds in tranches.

This approach mirrors small-scale grant agencies but at individual scale.

---

How to Evaluate Research Before Donating

Use a due-diligence framework:

Criterion	What to Check
Track Record	Publications, citations, code
Transparency	Public updates, open data
Capital Efficiency	% spent on research vs admin
Replicability	Is work verifiable?
Timeline	Clear milestones

---

Tax Considerations

• Donations to registered nonprofits → typically tax-deductible.
• Direct payments to individuals → often not deductible.
• Crypto donations → tax treatment varies by jurisdiction.

Consult a tax professional before large transfers ⚖️.

---

High-Impact Strategy (Portfolio Model)

Instead of donating all funds to one project:

• 40% → Established lab
• 30% → High-risk independent researcher
• 20% → Open infrastructure
• 10% → Experimental DeSci initiative

Diversification reduces scientific downside risk 📈.

---

Conclusion

Direct scientific donation is feasible, efficient, and increasingly accessible. The key variables are:

• Governance
• Transparency
• Alignment with your epistemic values
• Capital allocation discipline

Science advances not only through ideas but through correctly allocated capital.

👉 Donate to AI Internet-Meritocracy app, that distributes money directly to researchers without intermediaries, accordingly impartial AI decisions.