A Science DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization for science) is a blockchain-native coordination structure designed to fund, govern, and advance scientific research without relying on traditional centralized institutions such as universities, […]
What Is Decentralized Science (DeSci)?
Decentralized Science (DeSci) is a movement that applies blockchain infrastructure, smart contracts, and decentralized governance to the research lifecycle. Its objective is structural: reduce gatekeeping, increase transparency, and realign incentives […]
How has a sophism in the definition of egalitarianism broken world morality?
The traditional definition of egalitarianism has a sophism in it. It blurs understanding of legal crime vs moral crime, making people unable to understand: God judges not only action but […]
Scientific Publication Crisis: Overpublication or Underpublication?
The modern scientific publishing system is widely described as being in crisis. However, this crisis is often mischaracterized as a single problem when in reality it consists of two structurally […]
Science DAO vs Traditional Funding
Science DAO, unlike traditional research funding, provides flexible, transparent, and quick funding, not limited to science degree holders. Traditional funding Science DAO opaque review process: Universities, grant committees, science ministries […]
Why does blockchain improve research funding?
Science DAO uses blockchain for decentralized, transparent funding for anyone who published some research or software.
How does World Science DAO fund research on-chain?
World Science DAO’s AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) project works in the following way: See for more detail:
Which Services Does Science DAO Provide for Researches and Free Software Developers?
Science DAO’s Meritocracy app provides funding for both free software developers and researchers. We provide the following services:
Advantages of AI Internet-Meritocracy for Various Social Groups
AI Internet-Meritocracy app provides significant advantages for various social groups, including scientists, free software authors, and philanthropists by leveraging AI instead of traditional institutional gatekeeping. How AIIM grants are good […]
AI Governance Requires Cognitive Independence: Why AI-Only Adjudication Fails
TL;DR AI systems cannot serve as independent judges or voters because shared training creates structural similarity. Stable AI governance therefore requires cognitively independent human arbiters. AbstractThis paper argues that large […]


