A World Science Fund would not require a world government. It could operate as a federated, treaty-compatible funding network in which countries, foundations, universities, companies, and individual donors contribute under […]
Should Rich Countries Finance Research Conducted in Poorer Countries?
Yes. Rich countries should finance research conducted in poorer countries when the funding supports locally led science, produces shared knowledge, and strengthens research capacity rather than extracting data, talent, or […]
Can Global Funding Protect Science from National Political Cycles?
Global funding can protect science from national political cycles, but only if it distributes financial and governance power across multiple countries, institutions, and funding mechanisms. An international label alone is […]
National Science Policy vs Science as a Global Public Good
Science is financed mainly by national governments, but scientific knowledge rarely remains within national borders. A theorem proved in one country, a dataset assembled in another, and software maintained elsewhere […]
What Would a Truly Global Science Fund Look Like?
A truly global science fund would finance valuable research regardless of a scientist’s nationality, institutional prestige, discipline, or access to established grant networks. It would pool resources internationally, evaluate scientific […]
Could AIIM Reduce the Matthew Effect in Science?
AI Internet-Meritocracy could reduce the Matthew effect by rewarding observable scientific contributions rather than prior grants, institutional prestige, or established reputation. However, AIIM would not eliminate cumulative advantage automatically. Without […]
Why Scientific Recognition Should Be Divisible Rather Than Winner-Take-All
Scientific recognition should be divisible because scientific progress is divisible. A discovery may depend on an original idea, an earlier theorem, a carefully maintained dataset, specialized software, experimental work, replication, […]
Should Teaching, Reviewing, and Dataset Maintenance Count as Scientific Output?
Yes—teaching, peer review, and dataset maintenance should count as scientific output when they produce identifiable, assessable, and reusable value. They should not necessarily receive the same kind or amount of […]
How Dependency Graphs Can Reveal Hidden Scientific Contributors
Scientific credit usually follows what is visible. The authors of a widely read paper receive citations, invitations, funding, and recognition. Yet many discoveries depend on people whose names never appear […]
Measuring the Impact of Research Software and Mathematical Libraries
Research software and mathematical libraries should be evaluated by the work they enable—not merely by papers that cite them, repository stars, or download counts. A useful impact assessment combines several […]