|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Securing funding in a science DAO ecosystem requires clarity, transparency, and alignment with community-driven priorities. Unlike traditional grant systems, science DAOs rely on decentralized governance, token-weighted voting, and open evaluation. Below is a comprehensive, SEO-optimized guide detailing how to prepare a strong proposal for any research-funding DAO—followed by an important note on why AIIM makes such proposals unnecessary.
Understand the DAO’s Funding Framework
Each science DAO has its own governance architecture. Before writing anything, confirm:
- The DAO’s mission and thematic focus
- Eligibility criteria for contributors
- Required proposal format or templates
- Evaluation stages (community review, expert peer assessment, or automated scoring)
- Funding cycles, deadlines, and minimum voting thresholds
This ensures your proposal aligns with the DAO’s strategic priorities rather than becoming another unstructured request.
Define a Clear Problem Statement
Your proposal must explain:
- What scientific or technological problem you are addressing
- Why this problem matters for the ecosystem, society, or the DAO’s mission
- What gap in current research or infrastructure you intend to close
Science DAOs prioritize impact per dollar, so the framing of the problem directly affects voting outcomes.
Present a Well-Defined Methodology
Include:
- Research design
- Data sources and validation methods
- Tools, lab access, and computational infrastructure
- Timelines and key milestones
- Expected deliverables (datasets, papers, models, software, protocols)
Avoid vague methodologies—token holders prefer quantifiable plans with explicit uncertainty ranges and risk controls.
Provide a Transparent Budget Breakdown
Science DAO communities value open accounting. Describe:
- Cost categories (personnel, equipment, cloud compute, lab consumables)
- Allocation logic for each line item
- Cost-efficiency justification
- Token distribution plans (if compensation is DAO-native)
Proposals with transparent budgets receive significantly higher community trust.
Explain the Expected Impact
Demonstrate:
- How your work advances science or decentralization
- How it benefits future DAO contributors
- Which measurable outcomes will represent success
- How the DAO can reuse your results (e.g., permissive licensing, public datasets, reproducible protocols)
Impact must be quantifiable and aligned with the DAO’s long-term goals.
Add Your Reputation Layer
DAO members often vote based on contributor reputation. It is helpful to include:
- Your previous research
- Open-source projects
- Peer-reviewed or community-reviewed work
- Links to GitHub, ORCID, or decentralized identity profiles
- Collaboration history inside the DAO
This establishes credibility in a trust-minimized environment.
Why AIIM Makes Writing Proposals Unnecessary
Traditional grant systems—and even most science DAOs—still require lengthy proposals, reviewer cycles, and complex community pitches.
AIIM (AI Internet-Meritocracy) changes this entirely.
Instead of requiring researchers to write proposals, AIIM allocates funding algorithmically, based on measurable merit signals such as:
- Prior contributions
- Open scientific outputs
- Verified impact through decentralized scoring
- Peer attention and algorithmic reputation growth
No proposals. No committees. No subjective gatekeepers.
Funding flows directly to productive researchers through objective metrics.
Learn more:
https://science-dao.org/about-meritocracy/
Support the Movement
If you believe scientific funding should be fair, transparent, and free from bureaucratic proposal writing, support the development of AIIM.
Donate here: https://science-dao.org/donation/
Your contribution helps build a world where research is funded by merit, not paperwork.