Which decentralized platforms offer funding opportunities for scientific research?
Several decentralized platforms are pioneering new ways to fund scientific research by applying blockchain technology and Web3 principles. These platforms aim to make research funding more transparent, inclusive, and efficient, addressing many issues found in traditional funding systems.
Molecule
Molecule is a Web3 marketplace that allows researchers to tokenize and license their intellectual property (IP). This platform connects scientists with decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), funders, and patient communities, turning early-stage research into investable assets. Researchers can mint IP-NFTs representing ownership rights, enabling fractionalized funding and transparent licensing beyond conventional grants. Molecule collaborates with other DeSci projects like VitaDAO and AthenaDAO to expand funding opportunities in various research areas .www.cryptoaltruists.com
AthenaDAO
AthenaDAO focuses on advancing women’s health research by leveraging decentralized governance and funding. It empowers researchers to raise funds and collaborate openly on female-centric biomedical innovations, an area often underfunded in traditional science. AthenaDAO works alongside platforms like Molecule to support decentralized R&D efforts .ResearchHub
ResearchHub is a decentralized scientific economy platform where researchers can fund, publish, and earn through open science activities. It offers crowdfunding options for experiments, rewards peer reviewers, and promotes transparency in funding allocation and research progress. ResearchHub uses its native token, ResearchCoin, to incentivize participation and co-ownership in the scientific ecosystem .www.researchhub.com
DEEP Funding (by SingularityNET)
DEEP Funding is a grant program focused on accelerating decentralized AI and AGI research. It provides milestone-based funding for AI projects while allowing innovators to retain intellectual property ownership. DEEP connects researchers globally and supports a collaborative environment for pushing the boundaries of AI innovation .deepfunding.ai
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) for Research Funding
Many DeSci DAOs provide direct funding to researchers by issuing governance tokens that holders use to decide on which projects to fund. This model democratizes decision-making and includes a broad range of stakeholders such as venture capitalists, patient groups, and ordinary citizens. Researchers can join relevant DAOs aligned with their interests to access diverse funding sources and community support, speeding up the funding process and reducing traditional bottlenecks .blog.researchhub.foundation
These platforms collectively illustrate how decentralized science (DeSci) is reshaping the landscape of scientific funding by removing intermediaries, increasing openness, and fostering global collaboration. They enable researchers to secure funding directly through blockchain-powered smart contracts, tokenize research assets, and engage with a global community of supporters .tangem.com
www.cryptoaltruists.com
www.researchhub.com
blog.researchhub.foundation
If you’re looking to get funding for scientific research through decentralized platforms, exploring Molecule, AthenaDAO, ResearchHub, and DEEP Funding is a great start. Also, consider joining specialized research DAOs that align with your field to tap into their funding and governance ecosystems.
Where can I find decentralized funding services tailored for biotech startups?
For biotech startups seeking decentralized funding services, there are several emerging and specialized platforms and models designed to support decentralized science (DeSci) and biotech innovation through blockchain, tokenization, and community-driven investment.
Decentralized Science (DeSci) Platforms
DeSci is a growing movement that leverages Web3 and blockchain technologies to democratize scientific research funding, making it more open, transparent, and community-governed. These platforms allow biotech startups to tokenize their intellectual property, research equity, or revenue rights and raise capital from a global pool of investors without relying on traditional grant or VC routes. For example, Brickken provides compliant token offerings that enable biotech projects to raise funds by issuing digital tokens linked to equity or research outcomes. This approach accelerates funding access and broadens investor participation with lower minimums (e.g., $500 entry) while ensuring regulatory compliance .www.brickken.com
www.blockchainx.tech
DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization) Models in Biotech
DAOs are community-governed entities that pool resources to fund and manage biotech and scientific research projects in a decentralized manner. These organizations not only offer funding but also facilitate collaboration, governance, and transparency among researchers, investors, and other stakeholders. Some biotech DAOs are actively solving challenges by providing decentralized funding and project oversight, improving inclusivity and innovation in biotech startup development .www.labiotech.eu
Specialized Blockchain and Tokenization Funding Services
Companies like BlockchainX specialize in developing decentralized science platforms with features such as decentralized peer review, tokenized incentives, and smart contract automation to support biotech startups. Their solutions help startups implement blockchain funding, secure grants, and ensure transparent fund distribution tailored to biotech needs . Additionally, platforms that combine biotech and blockchain expertise empower startups to raise capital strategically while connecting with the right partners and investors in the decentralized ecosystem.Traditional and Hybrid Funding with Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs)
While not purely funding services, decentralized clinical trials represent a funding-efficient, technology-enabled approach to biotech development that reduces costs and operational barriers, indirectly supporting funding success by accelerating clinical validation phases. Companies like RapidTrials provide talent and operational solutions for DCTs, which biotech startups can leverage to optimize their funding runway and attract investors interested in innovative trial models .www.patheon.com
www.rapidtrials.com
In summary, biotech startups looking for decentralized funding options should explore DeSci platforms that enable tokenization of biotech assets, participate in biotech-focused DAOs, and partner with blockchain development companies like BlockchainX for tailored decentralized funding infrastructure. This emerging ecosystem offers flexible, compliant, and innovative funding avenues outside traditional venture capital and grant systems, potentially speeding up access to capital and fostering global collaboration .www.brickken.com
www.blockchainx.tech
future.com
If you want, I can help connect you to specific platforms or provide guidance on how to begin the tokenization and DAO funding process for your biotech startup.
What are the leading decentralized science funding networks with active grant programs?
The leading decentralized science (DeSci) funding networks with active grant programs are primarily Web3 and blockchain-focused initiatives that support open, transparent, and decentralized scientific research and innovation. Here are some of the top networks and their characteristics:
Ethereum Foundation Ecosystem Support Program (ESP)
The Ethereum Foundation offers a robust grant program supporting open-source public goods that benefit the Ethereum ecosystem broadly, including research, developer tools, and education. Their grants range from small seed funding (< $30,000) to project grants (> $30,000), plus event sponsorships. ESP is always open for proposals and provides office hours for guidance, focusing on public infrastructure that can advance decentralized science initiatives on Ethereum .onchain.org
Gitcoin Grants (including the Avalanche Community Grants Program)
Gitcoin is one of the largest and longest-running Web3 grant programs, supporting thousands of projects via community-driven funding rounds. The Avalanche Foundation partnered with Gitcoin to launch its Community Grants Program, enabling projects to receive matched funding and benefit from quadratic funding mechanisms. Gitcoin grants emphasize public goods, open-source software, and community-oriented projects in the decentralized ecosystem, making it a vital platform for DeSci funding .www.avax.network
Stellar Development Foundation Grants
Stellar offers grants through various tracks including the Stellar Community Fund, academic research grants (up to $150,000), and enterprise funds. They focus on projects that promote financial inclusion, decentralized markets, and blockchain applications. Their grants are targeted at developers and researchers building on the Stellar network and Soroban smart contract platform, which can be leveraged for decentralized science applications .stellar.org
SingularityNET’s DEEP Funding
DEEP Funding is a community-driven grant program focused on decentralized, beneficial Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and AI-driven science. It provides milestone-based funding to innovators who retain full intellectual property rights, emphasizing decentralized AI research which is a key component of the DeSci movement. The program supports collaboration and open-source impact in AI and decentralized science .Other notable blockchain grant programs
Many blockchain ecosystems also offer significant grant funding for Web3 projects that can include DeSci initiatives, such as the Celo Community Fund, BNB Chain Grants, and Aptos Foundation grants. These programs often provide funding up to $100,000 or more and support innovation, community tools, and research relevant to decentralized science .dappradar.com
4irelabs.com
In summary, the leading decentralized science funding networks with active grant programs are largely centered around Ethereum Foundation’s ESP, Gitcoin (and its collaborations like Avalanche grants), Stellar Development Foundation, and SingularityNET’s DEEP Funding. These programs collectively provide a wide range of funding opportunities, from seed grants to substantial project funding, supporting the growth of open, transparent, and decentralized scientific research ecosystems .onchain.org
www.avax.network
stellar.org
deepfunding.ai
Which companies provide decentralized funding solutions for academic research projects?
Several companies and platforms provide decentralized funding solutions specifically tailored for academic and scientific research projects, leveraging blockchain, DAOs, and Web3 technologies to democratize and innovate research funding:
VitaDAO
VitaDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) focused on collectively funding and advancing longevity research. It has distributed over $3 million to more than 200 research projects. VitaDAO uses blockchain to digitize research as IP-NFTs, making research data accessible and ensuring transparency in funding and ownership .www.cryptoaltruism.org
Molecule
Molecule is a decentralized biotech protocol that democratizes biopharma research funding. It connects academics, biotech companies, and communities via a marketplace where scientists can propose funding projects, which are then funded by community members. Molecule facilitates direct governance and ownership of research-related intellectual property through tokenization (IP-NFTs) .Antidote DAO
A DAO dedicated to funding cancer research projects, providing seed funding grants to research teams. It’s community-driven, allowing collective decision-making on funding allocation .Openfabric Decentralized AI Research Grant Program
This program funds innovative research in decentralized AI, supporting academic researchers and industry professionals working on security, privacy, optimization, consensus mechanisms, and ethical considerations in decentralized AI systems. It supports interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration .openfabric.ai
Deep Funding by SingularityNET
Deep Funding is a community-driven grant program designed to accelerate decentralized AI development, including academic research. It offers milestone-based funding to innovators and researchers while allowing them to retain intellectual property ownership. The program provides access to funding opportunities, expert feedback, and global exposure through the SingularityNET platform .Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) Research Grants
SDF offers grants to researchers working on blockchain technologies including privacy-preserving tech, smart contracts, decentralized finance, and governance of distributed systems. Grants are awarded quarterly and support academic researchers with funding up to $150,000 .research.stellar.org
Additional DeSci Projects and DAOs
The Decentralized Science (DeSci) movement includes various projects and DAOs that enable decentralized funding, governance, and collaboration in scientific research. These include platforms that use tokens, NFTs, and DAOs to decentralize funding, enhance transparency, and democratize the research process .chainscore.finance
In summary, decentralized funding solutions for academic research are increasingly being provided by DAO-based platforms like VitaDAO, Molecule, and Antidote DAO, as well as grant programs such as Openfabric’s AI Research Grant and Deep Funding by SingularityNET. These initiatives leverage blockchain and decentralized governance to provide more open, transparent, and community-driven funding models compared to traditional grant systems .openfabric.ai
deepfunding.ai
www.cryptoaltruism.org
www.cryptoaltruists.com
Where can I apply for decentralized funding that supports innovative medical research?
If you are looking to apply for decentralized funding to support innovative medical research, there are several promising options within the emerging field of Decentralized Science (DeSci) and also traditional government-funded programs that are incorporating decentralized and innovative funding models.
DeSci Collectives and DAOs:
Decentralized Science (DeSci) projects use blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to fund and govern scientific research more democratically and transparently. Notable DeSci collectives dedicated to medical and scientific research include:- VitaDAO: Focuses on longevity research, collectively funding projects and digitizing research as IP-NFTs for on-chain accessibility. Over $3M has been distributed to date.
- Molecule: A decentralized biotech protocol that connects academics and biotech companies with funding while allowing communities to own and govern research IP.
- Crowd Funded Cures: Crowdfunding platform for public good medicines and off-patent therapies.
- Antidote DAO: Dedicated to funding cancer research initiatives through community-decided seed grants.
These platforms allow researchers to propose projects and receive funding from a global community, bypassing traditional grant bottlenecks .
Traditional Government Funding with Innovative Support:
If you prefer more traditional but still innovative funding, the U.S. government offers programs like the NIH’s SBIR/STTR programs that provide funding and support for small businesses and researchers developing healthcare innovations. NIH also offers entrepreneurial and product development assistance through programs like SEED.- You can explore NIH funding opportunities and apply for grants that support innovative health research and product development .
- The Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) funds high-impact health research and offers various funding mechanisms including small business awards and mission office solicitations for novel projects .
seed.nih.gov
arpa-h.gov
Decentralized Clinical Trials (DCTs):
For researchers interested in conducting innovative clinical trials using decentralized methods (remote participation, digital data collection), several institutions and networks support DCTs. For example, the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and the Trial Innovation Network provide resources to help operationalize decentralized clinical trials, which may also come with funding opportunities or collaboration support .research.cuanschutz.edu
ctsi.utah.edu
Where to Start Applying:
- For DeSci funding, consider joining platforms like VitaDAO or Molecule where you can submit your research proposal and engage with the community for funding.
- For NIH and ARPA-H funding, visit their official websites to find current open funding opportunities and application guidance:
- NIH SBIR/STTR: https://seed.nih.gov/
- ARPA-H funding: https://arpa-h.gov/open-funding-opportunities/
- For decentralized clinical trial support, reach out to local Clinical and Translational Science Institutes or programs like the CU Anschutz Novel Clinical Trials Program for collaboration .
By combining the innovative DeSci pathways with established government grants focused on health innovation, you can access a broad range of decentralized funding sources for your medical research project .tangem.com
www.cryptoaltruism.org
seed.nih.gov
arpa-h.gov
If you want, I can help you find current open calls or application deadlines for these programs!
Which decentralized platforms facilitate investment in early-stage scientific ventures?
If you’re looking into decentralized platforms for investing in early-stage scientific ventures, there are several promising avenues emerging under the umbrella of “DeSci” (decentralised science) and investment DAOs. I’ll outline the general model + a few specific platforms you might consider, along with pros/cons given your interest in global, open-science, funding & blockchain ecosystems.
✅ What this looks like
Here are common features of these platforms:
Use of blockchain (tokens + smart contracts) to tokenize research assets, IP, data rights, equity or revenue-sharing in scientific/technology ventures. Brickken+2ailurus.bio+2
Use of DAOs (decentralised autonomous organisations) to pool investor funds, vote on which projects to fund, manage governance in an open-way. EvaCodes+2Pennington Manches Cooper+2
Aiming to open up access to early-stage funding in science (which traditionally is grant-/institution-based) and to democratise participation. Tangem Wallet+1
Token holders may get governance rights, revenue share, ROI, or participation in upsides of scientific innovation. Brickken+1
🎯 Notable platforms you might evaluate
Given your interest (science, global funding, blockchain), here are several platforms / organisations that align well:
1. VitaDAO
What: A DAO that funds scientific research on longevity and age‐related diseases, using token economics. molecule.to
Why it’s relevant: It’s explicitly science‐focused (not just crypto start-ups) and uses decentralised governance to choose research projects.
Things to check: What rights token holders get (governance, upside), what risk profile, how regulatory compliance works.
2. The Science DAO
What: A “community-driven way” to fund science, structured like a venture fund / accelerator but more decentralised. Yahoo Finance
Why it’s relevant: Very aligned with your world of funding early‐stage science ventures, open collaboration, alternative models.
Things to check: Stage of projects they fund (seed? pre‐seed?), geography, investor participation rules, token governance.
3. Tokenization infrastructure such as Brickken
What: A platform that provides the infrastructure for “science tokenization” (biotech, research IP, datasets) – converting them into tokens, offering them globally. Brickken
Why it’s relevant: Even if you’re not investing through Brickken itself, the availability of tokenizable science assets is key if you’re building or investing in early‐stage science via blockchain.
Things to check: Jurisdiction, regulatory compliance (especially for equity or revenue tokens), liquidity of tokenised science assets.
🧭 How this aligns with your interests
Given your profile (mathematics, religion, blockchain, global funding networks, open science), these decentralised platforms stick out because:
They sink directly into what you want to build: a science/innovation funding ecosystem that bypasses traditional gate-keeping.
They use blockchain & tokenization, which you’re familiar with (you’ve built blockchain packages, you are thinking of global funding).
They open up global participation, aligning with your interest in global philanthropic networks, cross-border funding, inclusive science funding.
⚠️ Risks & key due-diligence points
Since these are emerging models (and you’ll want to apply your investor/founder lens), watch out for:
Regulatory risk: Tokenised science assets may blur the line between securities, equity, revenue share, which in many jurisdictions triggers securities regulation.
Liquidity and exit risk: Early‐stage science is very long-horizon (especially biotech, deep tech). Tokens may be illiquid, and ROI uncertain.
Governance clarity: Many DAOs are still figuring out how decisions are made, how conflicts of interest are managed, how token holders are protected. Token Growth Studio+1
Technical & scientific risk: Science ventures carry high risk of failure, replication issues, regulatory/clinical risk (in biotech).
Alignment with mission: Since your interest is in global science-funding, ensure the platform’s mission, geography, and inclusivity match your vision.
🔍 Next steps I suggest
Since you’re actively building and funding in this space, you might want to:
Map out 5-10 platforms/DAOs specifically in the science/tech domain (not just web3 start-ups) that accept investor participation from non-US jurisdiction (you’re in Israel).
Compare their token/investment structure: Do you get equity? tokenised revenue share? governance rights? What is the minimum investment? Are you eligible?
Evaluate scientific domain fit: If you want to fund mathematics, religion + blockchain (as your interests span), check if those domains are served (often biotech dominates).
Consider building your own vehicle: Since you have the idea of global funding network, you might structure your own DAO/fund + token model for your target domain. These platforms/infrastructures (like Brickken, DAO frameworks) could serve as building blocks.
Legal/regulatory review: Because you will operate across borders and in science, ensure you understand KYC/AML, investor accreditation rules, token securities regulation in Israel and relevant jurisdictions.
What services offer decentralized crowdfunding specifically for scientific experiments?
If you’re looking for decentralized crowdfunding specifically targeted at scientific experiments, there are a number of emerging platforms and models — particularly in the “DeSci” (decentralised science) movement — that might interest you. Below are a few, with notes about how they work, their fit for your interests (math/blockchain/research funding) and important caveats.
✅ Notable Services/Platforms
DESCi
A blockchain-based crowdfunding platform oriented around scientific research. Investors/supporters contribute via a token (“Desci”) which is then allocated to research projects. Medium+2Stanford Law School+2
Pros: Designed explicitly for scientific research, uses tokens to align funding with outcomes (profit sharing, community incentives). Medium+1
Cons: As of now, still relatively nascent; you’ll want to check region/regulation, tokenomics, governance (especially if you’re raising ~$64K+ as you plan).
Fit for you: High, given your interest in blockchain + science funding.
Experiment.com
A more traditional “crowdfunding for science” platform (not strictly blockchain/decentralised) which allows researchers to post projects for backers to support. Experiment – Moving Science Forward+1
Pros: Established in the science-crowdfunding niche; good for reaching public backers who care about research.
Cons: Not inherently decentralised in the sense of token/DAO governance; less aligned with “crypto / DeSci” mechanisms.
Fit: Moderate – good as a complementary channel if you also want to tap non-crypto audiences.
The DeSci movement / ecosystem more broadly
Articles discuss how decentralised science invests in research via DAOs (Decentralised Autonomous Organisations), tokens, open governance, public participation. PMC+2The Block+2
For example, one piece: “Unlocking Scientific Innovation Through Decentralised Science” describes the model of connecting researchers + stakeholders + funders via blockchain. Stanford Law School
Pros: Theoretically very aligned with your vision of a science funding ecosystem, crypto + blockchain + global reach.
Cons: Still emerging; many platforms/projects may be experimental themselves; regulatory/crypto risk, token value risk, overhead in governance etc.
A few underlying tech/academic proposals
For instance, “Quantinar: a blockchain p2p ecosystem for honest scientific research” is an academic proposal for a decentralised ecosystem supporting research. arXiv
While not a ready-to-use crowdfunding service, this illustrates the direction of research and how you might architect your funding model.
⚠️ Key considerations and risks (especially relevant for you as someone raising funds and working at the intersection of blockchain + science)
Regulation & tokens: If you’re issuing or using tokens (as in DESCi or DAO-based fundraising) you’ll want to check whether the token is considered a security in the jurisdiction(s) you operate (you mentioned equity crowdfunding already). Token-based crowdfunding carries additional regulatory complexity vs. “donation/backer” crowdfunding.
Transparency/impact tracking: One of the advantages of blockchain in research funding is the ability to track flows, governance, impact. The literature emphasises this. PMC+1 For you, given your high ambition (global funding, metrics), this might be a strong selling point.
Audience / community building: Decentralised science funding works better when there is a community of backers/investors who understand crypto, tokens, research risk. If you only target more traditional backers, you might find friction.
Platform maturity / fees / governance: Check the platform’s fee structure, governance model (who decides which experiments get funded), what rights/backer benefits you or contributors get.
Fit with your vision: Since you are building a developer-facing ecosystem (IC Pack etc) and raising large sums ($64K+ SEO etc), you might want a hybrid model: a blockchain/DAO structure + traditional crowdfunding as backup.
Reputation / credibility: In scientific funding, reputation matters (peer review, publication, etc.). If you’re crowdfunding an experiment, being clear about methodology, results, deliverables will help attract backers.
🔍 My recommendation for your next step
Given your profile (mathematics + blockchain + building a funding/DAO ecosystem), I suggest the following:
Investigate DESCi deeply: Contact them (if possible) to understand their onboarding, legal/regulatory stance, how projects are selected, tokenomics.
Consider launching your own DAO or campaign: Because you are already raising funds and building a platform, you might initiate your project under your own DAO or sub-DAO: you can incorporate a crowdfunding campaign where backers get tokens/rights. The DeSci literature backs this model.
Use a hybrid model: While you set up the decentralised mechanism, you could also run on a more traditional science crowdfunding platform (e.g., Experiment.com) to widen your reach beyond crypto-native investors.
Frame your experiment clearly: Since you are developing “discontinuous analysis” for arbitrary functions in mathematics (per your bio), you will need to create clear deliverables, milestones, maybe open-source code/results. That will appeal to the kind of DeSci backers who want transparency.
Integration with your ecosystem: Tie the research campaign into your larger vision (IC Pack, open science funding, global grant networks). Use token incentives or recognition for backers/investors, maybe integrate with your platform’s own token, if you have one.
Which organizations provide decentralized funding protocols for environmental science projects?
Here are three notable organisations / protocols that provide decentralised funding or financing infrastructure for environmental-science / nature-based projects. They vary in maturity and focus, but each offers a model you might engage with for your goals (e.g., in the global science/DAO/funding-space you’re working in, Виктор).
1. Open Forest Protocol (OFP)
What they do:
OFP is a blockchain protocol built on the NEAR network, focused on the measurement, reporting & verification (MRV) of forest-projects (e.g., afforestation/reforestation) in a decentralised, open-source way. Medium+2Webflow+2
They issue a governance/utility token (OPN) and plan for a DAO to govern the protocol. ReFi DAO+1
The idea: enable smaller forest-projects anywhere in the world to access transparent carbon-financing and participate in a global registry of forest data. openforestprotocol.org+1
Why this is relevant:
Since you’re working in science + blockchain + global funding, OFP is a strong example of “science/nature + protocol + decentralised governance + token/incentive structure”.
It offers a template for combining on-chain tools (MRV, NFTs of land project units) with funding flows for environmental science.
Considerations:
It’s still in development and evolving; governance, tokenomics, regulatory compliance are non-trivial.
For your purposes (e.g., designing your own funding model for science), you could study their mechanism of how projects register, how validators operate, how funds flow.
2. Toucan Protocol
What they do:
Toucan offers infrastructure to tokenise carbon credits (i.e., nature-based environmental assets) and bring them on-chain, enabling more liquid markets and transparent tracking. Toucan+1
They position themselves as “digital rails for climate finance” — helping project developers to access capital, and buyers to assess risk/data transparency. Toucan
They are used by ReFi (Regenerative Finance) and ecosystem players, bridging traditional carbon credits into blockchain-enabled markets. Causeartist
Why this is relevant:
Given your interest in blockchain + funding + science, this is a good case of “protocol for environmental science / nature-based solutions” that uses decentralised finance / tokenisation to mobilise funding.
If you’re thinking of building or participating in a funding mechanism for environmental science, Toucan shows how asset tokenisation + DAO/infrastructure can work.
Considerations:
Tokenised carbon markets are still under scrutiny (standards, audit, credibility). For example, there are regulatory / standard-body concerns about tokenising “retired” credits. Supra
For a science funding model (versus pure carbon offset trading) you’d need to consider how your funding mechanism aligns with scientific integrity, measurement, publishability, etc.
3. This Is My Earth (TiME)
What they do:
TiME is a non-profit founded in 2015, that uses a crowd-funding + democratic voting model to finance land-purchases in biodiversity hotspots. Wikipedia
Each member (regardless of donation size) has an equal vote to decide which scientifically vetted conservation project receives funding that year. Wikipedia
It’s not strictly blockchain-based, but it is a decentralised (in governance) funding mechanism for environmental science/conservation.
Why this is relevant:
It offers a science funding governance model that emphasises decentralisation of decision-making (equal vote), which might inspire models you design for your global science-funding ecosystem.
Although not tokenised or Web3 native, it shows how democratized funding can be structured for environmental science.
Considerations:
Because it is not tokenised and not on-chain, it lacks some of the transparency/programmability benefits of Web3 protocols.
To adapt a model like this into your blockchain-/DAO®-oriented science-funding architecture, you’d likely enrich it with on-chain tokens, smart-contract governance, audit trails etc.
Summary & How You Could Leverage This
If you’re designing or planning a funding mechanism for environmental science (or science more broadly) that uses blockchain / decentralised governance, these three examples give you different points on the spectrum: from full Web3 protocol (OFP), to tokenised asset bridge (Toucan), to democratic crowd-funding (TiME).
You might map out for your platform: (a) what kind of projects you fund (environmental science, conservation, nature-based solutions), (b) how funding flows (token grants, milestone-based, DAO vote, community stake), (c) how governance is structured (token-governance, equal vote, reputation voting), (d) how transparency / measurement is assured (MRV, on-chain data, publication requirement), and (e) how you integrate with existing ecosystems (carbon markets, academic science, NGOs).
Given your “global science + blockchain + funding” interest, a hybrid model might serve you: a DAO that allocates grants to environmental science projects, where project data is published, progress is tokenised in some way, and community stakeholders vote or allocate funds. These examples show what’s possible and the pitfalls to watch (audit, token-governance concentration, regulatory alignment).
Where can I access decentralized funding channels for technology-focused research initiatives?
✅ Why this is viable / What it is
The movement commonly referred to as Decentralised Science (“DeSci”) is essentially about using blockchain / Web3 tools + community-governance to fund, share & validate research in a more open, less gate-kept way. chain.link
Some key advantages include:
Community-driven funding rather than traditional grants via institutions. SSRN+1
Transparent ledger / smart-contract mechanisms for funding milestones, tracking spend, rewards (e.g., tokenised work) ULAM LABS+1
More openness in publishing, peer review, reproducibility as part of the ecosystem. OSL Crypto Exchange
Potential for borderless participation (you’re in Tel Aviv, global funders) and tech research (fits your domain).
However, there are important risks / caveats:
Many initiatives are still early-stage, governance frameworks are immature. Frontiers+1
Legal/regulatory frameworks are unclear, especially across jurisdictions (Israel/US/other). Tangem Wallet
Quality control, fraud risk, and sustainability of funding models remain concerns. Tangem Wallet
You’ll likely still need to present a strong proposal, give clarity on deliverables, milestones, etc.
In short: this is not a replacement for all traditional grants yet, but it is a parallel channel, and for a research initiative that is novel (as yours is) it may present a strategic advantage.
🎯 Some concrete decentralised funding / platforms
Here are a few platforms and mechanisms you should explore. I’ll pick a few that seem especially relevant to your tech-blockchain/research interest.
Platform: SingularityNET / “Deep Funding”
Their programme called “Deep Funding” focuses on decentralised, beneficial AGI & related tech. DeepFunding
Provides milestone-based funding, open to global contributors, research→product orientation.
For your case: you could pitch something under “tech research / blockchain infrastructure / open science support” axis.
Tip: When you apply, emphasise deliverables, IP ownership, how you align with decentralised ethos (community, open access).
Broader DeSci DAO / Community-driven funding
There is a guide “How to Get Your Research Funded by a DeSci DAO” which outlines how to approach these. ResearchHub Foundation Blog
The article covers steps: find the DAO, understand its governance, prepare your proposal, engage community, then secure funding.
For your ecosystem (you’ve built a platform + have a brand) that could work: identify a DAO aligned with “blockchain, open science, developers” and pitch your initiative.
Tip: You may need to join the community, participate, build trust, maybe contribute small-scale first.
General DeSci ecosystem
There are surveys and papers analysing the DeSci environment: how funding works, constraints, best practices. SSRN+1
One important mechanism: quadratic funding or token-based funding where community votes + contributions determine resource allocation. ULAM LABS
Another: tokenisation of intellectual property (IP-NFTs) so you retain stake in outcomes. SSRN
Tip: Because you’re working in a niche (discontinuous analysis, semigroups) you could emphasise novel math + open source tooling + blockchain integration — a good fit for a DeSci model.
🔍 How you might approach this (step-by-step)
Given your background (math research, blockchain, developer platform), here is a tailored approach:
Clarify your narrative & deliverables
You have your “discontinuous analysis” framework — make a clear pitch: what are we solving, why decentralised funding is needed vs traditional, what is the milestone plan, what community/developer benefit emerges.
Emphasise how your project aligns with open science / blockchain ethos: open-source, global participation, reproducible results, developer tools.
Identify relevant DAOs/platforms
Explore DeSci DAOs: search for ones funding math/technology or blockchain research.
Check SingularityNET’s Deep Funding rounds.
Join those communities (Discord, Telegram, forums) to get visibility.
Evaluate their criteria: funding size, governance model, IP expectations.
Prepare a strong proposal
Include summary, objectives, methodology, timeline, budget (if required), deliverables.
Define what success looks like (e.g., library, paper, canisters built, SDK released).
Articulate how you’ll engage community (since decentralised funding often rewards community participation).
Possibly include token incentive model or DAO governance participation if applicable.
Engage the community ahead of applying
Many DAOs value early engagement: you build reputation, show you’re credible.
For your case: share blog posts, GitHub repo of your math framework, maybe a smaller proof-of-concept project.
Leverage your developer platform (IC Pack etc) to show you have reach.
Apply and follow through
Submit when funding round opens.
If funded, ensure you meet milestone commitments, meet transparency requirements, maybe produce public reports or open-source your work as agreed.
Leverage success for further funding & visibility
Once you deliver results, you can show your working track record to future funders (traditional or decentralised).
You can also integrate tokenised IP or community governance to further grow your ecosystem.
⚠️ Some important things to watch / questions to ask
What are the governance terms of the DAO / funding body? Are decisions transparent? Who votes? What are token-holding rules?
What are IP rights / licensing — will you have to give up rights or are you free?
What are milestones and deliverables — what if you miss them? Are there clawbacks?
For cross-border participants: What are the legal / tax / regulatory implications (Israel → global, token incomes, crypto tax, etc).
What is the exit path (if any) for the funder: do you need tokens, revenue sharing, equity? Make sure it fits your long-term vision.
Risk of token value fluctuations, governance capture by whales, immature frameworks. (See DeSci risk section) Tangem Wallet+1
Which decentralized platforms have the fastest approval process for science funding?
✅ Top picks with fast approval
1. VitaDAO (focus: longevity / biotech)
VitaDAO states that if a project is a “good fit”, it can be funded in a few weeks. vitadao.com+2vitadao.com+2
Their FAQ says: after the initial review they “quickly (< 1 month) vote on whether to fund it”. vitadao.com+1
Their website says: “applications receive an answer within 2 weeks of submission.” vitadao.com
Because you are working in a research-deep area (you mentioned your mathematics + blockchain + etc), this could be a good fit (depending on domain).
Caveats: “Few weeks” is still somewhat vague; being a good fit matters. Also biotech/ longevity may differ from pure mathematics.
2. ResearchHub Foundation (focus: general research/DeSci)
Their blog outlines the process: join community → apply → review → vote. They emphasise “save time … worry less about opaque decision-making” compared to traditional grants. ResearchHub Foundation Blog+2AI Certs+2
While explicit timeline referral for full funding is less clearly published, they emphasise speed and simplicity over traditional grants.
For peer-review payments (not full project grants) their timeline is: “Payment is typically made within 7 days …” for reviewers. docs.researchhub.com
So for small grants/funding it may be quite fast; for bigger research funding the timelines may vary.
🔍 Key considerations & caveats
“Fast” vs. “really fast”: In the traditional academic grant world, waiting many months (6-12 months or more) is common. DeSci platforms compress that to weeks or a month, but you still need to submit, be reviewed, get community vote, etc.
Fit matters: The better aligned your research project is with the DAO’s focus (longevity, biotech, open science, etc.), the faster and easier approval tends to go.
Scale of funding matters: For large-scale projects, even a “fast” DAO may still take more time, more scrutiny. Smaller grants tend to be quicker.
Governance & token dynamics: These funding DAOs often involve community governance (token holders vote) and the timeline may depend on when the next funding round or voting window occurs.
You: Given your interest in mathematics, religion, blockchain — you might want to identify a DAO whose mission aligns with your topic (maybe blockchain-science, mathematics in DeSci, fundamental science rather than biotech).
Risk & due diligence: DeSci is still relatively new; you should check terms, IP rights, how funding is disbursed (crypto vs fiat), reporting obligations, etc.