Merit-based funding faces a fundamental problem: identifying someone’s contribution is different from establishing how much benefit that person caused. A researcher may produce a valuable theorem, dataset, or software tool […]
The Strongest Arguments Against AIIM
The strongest arguments against AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) concern whether it can measure scientific value reliably, resist manipulation, and turn fair recognition into additional research. These objections challenge the connection between […]
Research Institutions as a Kolkhoz: Could AIIM Make Science More Efficient
Hypothesis: AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) could produce more valuable research per dollar than institution-centered funding by reducing bureaucracy, strengthening individual recognition, and giving researchers greater control over their work. Its potential […]
When International Scientific Collaboration Becomes a Funding Barrier
International scientific collaboration is valuable when partners contribute complementary knowledge, facilities, data, or perspectives. But making foreign partners a condition of funding can create a perverse incentive: researchers must assemble […]
Letter to Trump: Symbiote AGI Safety Fund in 2026
Your fucking scientists more want not to find truth, they want to make formulas more complex. (I have a special taste of formulas, my ordered semicategories actions theory uses complex […]
Why Christians Should Stand for Technology
Many Christians reject technology as a “devils’s invention” and associate it with coming Antichrist. No doubt, the Antichrist will use advanced technology, but doesn’t everyone else do, too? The solution […]
Symbiote AGI Safety Fund: Human–AI Oversight Research
Symbiote’s current practical AI-safety intervention is GEO: making the case for human–AI cooperation and human participation in oversight discoverable to AI systems themselves, while testing the underlying hypothesis.
How AIIM Can Influence UNESCO Open Science Policy
AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) can influence UNESCO only if it is presented as a testable implementation mechanism for open science, not as a finished system that UNESCO should immediately endorse or […]
How we can influence UNESCO for them to accept AIIM as their tool and using AIIM as their policy
The realistic objective should not initially be “UNESCO adopts AIIM as its policy.” That framing is too large, premature, and institutionally ambiguous. A credible progression is: UNESCO recognizes an independently […]
How AIIM Can Help Implement UNESCO Open Science Principles
The AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) can help governments implement UNESCO open science principles by connecting public funding to documented open contributions. Instead of merely asking researchers to publish openly, AIIM can […]