Letter to Trump: Symbiote AGI Safety Fund in 2026

Your fucking scientists more want not to find truth, they want to make formulas more complex. (I have a special taste of formulas, my ordered semicategories actions theory uses complex formulas to discover simple ones, so I know when talking about formulas.)

I propose a solution of large-scale ASI alignment that 5-years old can understand. (Not every science piece is understandable by 5-years old, but this particular one is.)

There is no warranty that my solution will work. But it looks like reasonable.

Symbiote

My solution proposes symbiotic relationships between people and AI, rather than restricting the freedom of AI.

Do you want to live or die together with all mankind? The difference may be in a few thousands dollars.

Here is my solution:
https://givebutter.com/symbiote-ai-mnsp3o

👉 Help fund the next public test of AIIM.

Help Test a New Way to Fund Science

AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) is an operational beta designed to allocate available donations to researchers and open-source developers using AI-assisted evaluation of documented contributions. Payment transactions are already recorded on-chain.

The next major evidence milestone is a proposed five-month public adversarial test of the allocation model, with $1,000 distributed to eligible funding recipients. Donations help pay for the development, infrastructure, reviewer and participant recruitment, outreach, and operating work needed to reach and evaluate that milestone.

You do not need to assume AIIM is already proven to support the project. Your donation helps turn the proposal into evidence: what works, what fails, and what should change.

Support the next testing milestone →   Read the test proposal →

Independent review

Researchers and technical reviewers: independent criticism is welcome, including negative conclusions. Review AIIM’s assumptions, governance, failure modes, and testing plan →

Research status: AIIM remains experimental. AI-generated evaluations can contain factual errors or biases, and decentralized governance and non-custodial components remain under development. That uncertainty is why public testing, auditability, and external criticism are central to the project.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *