Bologna system de-facto splits people into “castes”, making science stuck by excluding some parts of the science from public consideration. EU union is “Houthis”, that block development of all the science in its most thin place – independent scientists – like Houthis block oil transfer in the thinnest strait.
- The Bologna system splits all people into four categories: Bachelor, Masters, and doctoral degrees plus people without degrees.
- Basically, it means: Most people have no right for a salary, no matter what their self-learned knowledge is. That’s “Animal Farm” or “1984” from Orwell, but this dystopia is implemented in real life. It deprives most people of rights. “Most people” include some scientists, who are deprived of the right to receive salary and grants. Because scientists are monopolists, it creates monopolies without money, the worst kind of monopolies.
- We need a completely new system for science salaries. I develop AIIM (AI Internet-Meritocracy) software between all published scientists and free software developers, even ones not having a degree. Please, support the project.
Also, call for resignation of your science minister.
👉 Help fund the next public test of AIIM.
Help Test a New Way to Fund Science
AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) is an operational beta designed to allocate available donations to researchers and open-source developers using AI-assisted evaluation of documented contributions. Payment transactions are already recorded on-chain.
The next major evidence milestone is a proposed five-month public adversarial test of the allocation model, with $1,000 distributed to eligible funding recipients. Donations help pay for the development, infrastructure, reviewer and participant recruitment, outreach, and operating work needed to reach and evaluate that milestone.
You do not need to assume AIIM is already proven to support the project. Your donation helps turn the proposal into evidence: what works, what fails, and what should change.
Support the next testing milestone → Read the test proposal →
Independent review
Researchers and technical reviewers: independent criticism is welcome, including negative conclusions. Review AIIM’s assumptions, governance, failure modes, and testing plan →
Research status: AIIM remains experimental. AI-generated evaluations can contain factual errors or biases, and decentralized governance and non-custodial components remain under development. That uncertainty is why public testing, auditability, and external criticism are central to the project.
Thanks for the blog post, can I set it up so I receive an email sent to me every time there is a new update?