Open Source Developers Salary
Any open source developer can connect his/her GitHub account and (without any grant writing) become eligible for cryptocurrency grants since next week.
Scientists Salary (PhD or Amateur()
Any researcher (PhD not required) can connect his/her ORCID account and (without any grant writing) become eligible for cryptocurrency grants since next week.
Individual or Institutional Donor
Any potential donor can amplify their global impact, by supporting underrepresented R&D works by donating to World Science DAO.
Government Science Ministry
Any government in the world* can leverage use of the corresponding country fund in AIIM app to finance fair and efficient R&D financing for their citizens. In short: The government is just required to fund their country fund e.g. weekly or monthly. This replaces inefficient, costly, and unfair government science grants. The government just funds the account, all the work on paying for R&D in the country is done by the app automatically.
All world governments are also recommended to join the AIIM treaty. But it is not required: We can work together without signing this treaty.
*Exceptions, like North Korea, apply.
👉 Help fund the next public test of AIIM.
Help Test a New Way to Fund Science
AI Internet-Meritocracy (AIIM) is an operational beta designed to allocate available donations to researchers and open-source developers using AI-assisted evaluation of documented contributions. Payment transactions are already recorded on-chain.
The next major evidence milestone is a proposed five-month public adversarial test of the allocation model, with $1,000 distributed to eligible funding recipients. Donations help pay for the development, infrastructure, reviewer and participant recruitment, outreach, and operating work needed to reach and evaluate that milestone.
You do not need to assume AIIM is already proven to support the project. Your donation helps turn the proposal into evidence: what works, what fails, and what should change.
Support the next testing milestone → Read the test proposal →
Independent review
Researchers and technical reviewers: independent criticism is welcome, including negative conclusions. Review AIIM’s assumptions, governance, failure modes, and testing plan →
Research status: AIIM remains experimental. AI-generated evaluations can contain factual errors or biases, and decentralized governance and non-custodial components remain under development. That uncertainty is why public testing, auditability, and external criticism are central to the project.
Real clear website , thankyou for this post.