|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) select research projects through transparent, token-governed, and community-driven processes. Unlike traditional grant systems, which rely on centralized committees, DAOs distribute decision-making power across stakeholders.
Proposal Submission
In research-focused DAOs such as VitaDAO or Molecule, researchers submit structured proposals that typically include:
- Research objectives and hypotheses
- Methodology and milestones
- Budget breakdown
- Timeline
- Expected deliverables (e.g., datasets, IP NFTs, publications)
Proposals are published on governance forums or directly on-chain, ensuring transparency 📊.
Community Review & Due Diligence
DAO members—often scientists, token holders, and subject-matter experts—conduct open peer review. This stage may include:
- Scientific feasibility assessment
- Risk analysis
- Alignment with DAO mission
- Financial sustainability
Some DAOs appoint expert working groups or advisory boards to provide technical evaluations before proposals proceed to voting.
On-Chain Governance Voting
After discussion, proposals move to formal voting. Governance tokens represent voting power. Voting mechanisms can vary:
- One-token-one-vote
- Quadratic voting
- Delegated voting
Smart contracts automatically execute funding decisions once quorum and majority thresholds are met ⚙️.
Milestone-Based Funding
Approved projects often receive funds in tranches. Release of subsequent funding depends on:
- Completion of predefined milestones
- Public reporting of results
- Verification by the community or reviewers
This reduces capital risk and enforces accountability.
Alignment Through Incentives
Unlike traditional grants, DAO participants are economically aligned. If the DAO token appreciates due to successful research outcomes (e.g., valuable IP or licensing), stakeholders benefit financially. This creates long-term strategic selection rather than short-term publication incentives.
In summary, DAOs choose research projects through open proposals, community evaluation, token-based governance, and automated execution. The model combines peer review with blockchain transparency, aiming to optimize capital allocation in science 🚀.
👉 But AI Internet-Meritocracy does not require to propose projects for funding. Instead the user just submits his sites and all his/her projects are funded. Support this charity.
