Science DAO vs Traditional Funding

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Science DAO, unlike traditional research funding, provides flexible, transparent, and quick funding, not limited to science degree holders.

Traditional fundingScience DAO
opaque review process: Universities, grant committees, science ministries in-between a researcher and funding, nobody knows how they make decisions.fully transparent proposal evaluation: The full funding detail and AI reasoning are stored permanently.
slow grant distribution: It may pass over a year or more before receiving a grant. The receiver needs to write a grant proposal for every grant committee.instant on-chain transfers, it takes less than 2 weeks before funds reach a researcher or free software developer. No need for grant writing.
PhDs only, institutional gatekeeping, orientation to institutional prestige.Anyone who published research or free software is eligible for funding.
Review by committees that may be biased, politically engaged, even corrupted.The decision is made by candid AI and moderated for scams by equal voting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *